The best way to reach the site for errors, clarification requests, topic suggestions, or general publication feedback.
What to send
- Broken explanation or factual correction
- Topic request for a future guide or journal article
- Suggestion about site usability or navigation
- Professional collaboration or educational partnership inquiry
How to write a useful correction email
Include the page URL, the specific sentence or section, what appears incorrect or unclear, and a source or explanation if you have one. That makes review much faster.
How messages are triaged
Highest priority
Factual corrections, broken educational claims, or misleading page behavior that affects reader trust.
High priority
Accessibility issues, broken navigation, formula rendering failures, and serious quiz or glossary bugs.
Standard priority
Topic suggestions, requests for new sections, and broader feedback about site direction.
Short, specific messages help most.
If you are writing about a single page, one paragraph plus the URL is usually enough. If you are reporting a factual issue, specificity beats volume every time.
Corrections
For content issues, send the page URL and the exact point that needs review.
Ad or privacy questions
Use the same inbox, and reference the advertising disclosure or privacy policy when relevant.
Medical-context pieces
For journal entries that mention clinical examples or imaging, remember the site remains educational only. See the medical disclaimer.
Site strategy
Suggestions about study paths, content organization, and missing foundational material are especially helpful during the site's upgrade cycle.