About PhysicsTheories.com

Mission

PhysicsTheories.com exists to help students and curious readers understand physics with enough structure to be useful and enough plain language to stay readable. The site covers core topics such as mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, waves, optics, relativity, quantum physics, astrophysics, formulas, calculators, glossary entries, and exam-prep guides.

The goal is a smaller, cleaner, trustworthy indexed site. Pages should earn their place by teaching something concrete, connecting to related topics, and making assumptions visible.

Who The Site Is For

The primary readers are high-school students, undergraduate students, independent learners, tutors, and educators who want a fast route from a physics question to the correct model, equation, units, and interpretation.

Some advanced pages discuss research-adjacent ideas, but the site is not a journal, university, medical service, or substitute for formal instruction.

How The Site Is Maintained

Pages are reviewed for clarity, internal consistency, formula use, broken links, metadata, schema, and indexing status. Thin or unfinished pages may be excluded from the sitemap until they are rewritten.

Corrections and topic suggestions can be sent to contact@physicstheories.com.

Authorship And Verification

All articles are written and edited by Frank Urena, PhD, the site's lead author and editor. His doctoral training and research background can be independently verified through his ORCID record (0000-0002-0589-2963).

Publisher

PhysicsTheories.com is published by Gnostic Vampire Media LLC, an independent publishing house established in 2025. The company develops work across three areas — original fiction, physics and education, and plain-language civic information — and PhysicsTheories.com is its physics and education imprint.

Editorial questions about the site can be directed to contact@physicstheories.com, or to the publisher at editorial@gnosticvampiremedia.com.

Reader Accountability And Maintenance

PhysicsTheories.com treats trust pages as part of the educational product, not as decorative legal text. These pages explain who is responsible for the site, how corrections are handled, how sources are judged, how privacy and accessibility questions can be raised, and what limits apply to calculators, study guides, and examples.

Maintenance work is driven by local audits and reader feedback. Pages may be reviewed for broken links, malformed symbols, missing metadata, missing schema, thin content, outdated claims, misleading wording, and unsupported credentials. If a page does not meet the current standard, it may be rewritten, expanded, noindexed, or removed from the sitemap until it is useful enough for public indexing.

Readers should also treat the site with ordinary academic caution. Physics explanations are simplified for learning, and many formulas depend on assumptions such as idealized bodies, constant fields, negligible friction, small angles, nonrelativistic speeds, or standard SI units. High-stakes technical, medical, safety, legal, or engineering decisions require qualified professional review and should not rely on a study page alone.

The preferred way to improve these pages is specific feedback. When reporting a problem, include the URL, the sentence, equation, control, or policy line involved, and a short explanation of the concern. That makes it possible to correct the issue without adding vague claims or unnecessary boilerplate.

Trust documentation is reviewed alongside the public learning pages because policies can become stale just like formulas, calculators, and articles. When the site changes its indexing rules, contact process, advertising status, source standards, or accessibility workflow, the relevant trust page should be updated before the change is treated as complete.

The practical standard is simple: readers should be able to tell what the page promises, what it does not promise, who to contact, and how the policy affects their use of the site.